- Odogiyon Kehinde Titilade, Lawal Bala Isa & Adekunle Saheed Ajisebiyawo
- DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.24099869
- SSR Journal of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences (SSRJAHSS)
The deployment of artificial intelligence
(AI) technologies in public sector administration has emerged as one of the
most consequential governance debates of the early twenty-first century. In
Nigeria, federal agencies such as the Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS),
the National Identity Management Commission (NIMC) and the Nigeria Police Force
have adopted AI-enabled systems without a binding national regulatory framework
to govern their use. This paper examined the ethical implications, prospects and
institutional challenges of AI adoption in Nigerian public administration, with
particular attention to questions of data privacy, algorithmic bias,
accountability and citizen inclusion. Drawing on Institutional Theory as
developed by DiMaggio and Powell (1983) and the Responsible AI Governance
principles advanced by Florida et al. (2018), the study adopted a qualitative
research design employing multiple case study analysis and systematic document
review. Three cases were selected: the FIRS Tax Pro-Max tax administration
system, the NIMC digital identity programme and the Nigeria Police Force’s
acquisition of surveillance technologies. Findings revealed that AI adoption in
Nigeria’s public sector is predominantly driven by external pressures from
international donors and multilateral institutions rather than by domestically
formulated policy priorities. Ethical governance frameworks remain absent or
non-binding, data privacy violations have been documented in government-linked
data programmes, algorithmic bias risks are structurally embedded in government
datasets and accountability mechanisms are fragmented across institutions with
overlapping mandates. At the same time, evidence from Tax Pro-Max and the
federal payroll system demonstrated that AI can produce measurable improvements
in revenue collection and administrative efficiency when deployed under
appropriate governance conditions. The paper concluded that Nigeria’s central
challenge is not whether to adopt AI but how to govern its adoption in a manner
that is lawful, equitable and democratically accountable. Six policy
recommendations were advanced, targeting the National Assembly, the National
Information Technology Development Agency (NITDA) and relevant federal
ministries and agencies.
Keywords: Artificial intelligence, Public sector administration, AI ethics, Data privacy, AI governance.

