- Ahembe, Terna Richard1; Amine, A. Andrew1; Nev, O.Terfa1; Japheth, J. Kalang2
- DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21719325
- SSR Journal of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences (SSRJAHSS)
Background: The rise of
antimicrobial resistance has necessitated the search for alternative agents for
wound management. Honey has demonstrated broad-spectrum antimicrobial and wound
healing properties. Manuka honey is the clinical gold standard, but African
honeys remain largely unevaluated.
Aim: This study evaluated the antibacterial
and antifungal activities of honey from Obudu, Nigeria, Ngaoundere, Cameroon,
and compared them with Manuka honey against clinical isolates of common
wound-infecting microbes in vitro.
Methods:The Bauer et al. Agar well diffusion
and Broth dilution methods determined the zone of inhibition (ZOI), minimum
inhibitory concentration (MIC), and minimum bactericidal concentration/ minimum
fungicidal concentration (MBC/MFC).
Thirteen wound-infecting bacterial and fungal isolates were used,
including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), Staphylococcus aureus, Corynebacterium ulcerans,
Streptococcus pyogenes, Escherichia coli, Proteus mirabilis, Proteus vulgaris,
Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Candida albicans, Candida krusei, Candida stellatoides, and
Candida tropicalis.
Results: Isolates
were susceptible to all honey treatments at ≤ 48 mg/ml, though ZOI, MIC, and
MBC/MFC values differed,and some differences were statistically significant.
Obudu honey produced the highest ZOI across all organisms. Ngaundere honey had the lowest MIC for Staphylococcus aureus, Corynebacterium ulcerans,
Proteus vulgaris Pseudomonas and Candida albicans, while Obudu honey had the lowest MIC for MRSA, S. aureus, P. mirabilis, P. vulgaris and C. krusei. Manuka
honey had the lowest MIC for nine organisms, including all Candida
species. The MBC/MFC for all honeys was ≤ 48 mg/mL,
ranging from 3 mg/mL (MRSA, C. krusie, C.
stellatoidea, and C. tropicalis) to 48 mg/mL (VRE, S. pyogenes, E. coli, and P. aeruginosa) for Obudu honey, while Manuka honey’s MBC/MFC ranged from 4
and 24 mg/mL. Manuka honey was more effective against the fungal agents
evaluated.
Conclusion: Obudu and
Ngaoundere honey showed antimicrobial activity comparable to Manuka honey and
is suitable for treating wound-infecting microbes and for manufacture honey-embedded
wound dressings.
Keywords: Comparative
antibacterial activity, Manuka honey, Obudu honey, Ngaoundere honey,
wound-infecting microorganisms.
