- Job Gogo Otokwala1, Alagbe-Briggs Busola2
- DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15390805
- SSR Journal of Medical Sciences (SSRJMS)
Background: The prompt identification of critical illness plays a vital role in
averting complications such as multiple organ failure and enhancing patient
outcomes.
Aim: To evaluate
nurses’ documentation practices and ability to recognise and escalate for
prompt responses.
Methods: A retrospective
review of 170 patient vital signs charts from the ICU was conducted, focusing
on completeness of documentation, identification of abnormalities, escalation
responses, use of Early Warning Scores (EWS), and patient outcomes. Data were
collected from January 2023 to December 2024 and analysed using SPSS version
26.0.
Results: Documentation
compliance was high for temperature and blood pressure (100%), with slightly
lower rates for respiratory rate (98.2%), urine output (91.8%), and level of
consciousness (90.0%). Abnormal respiratory rates (60%) and blood pressure
(50%) were the most frequently recorded deviations. Recognition of
abnormalities using pen colour changes occurred in 95.3% of cases, but only
25.3% led to documented escalation, with a mean response time of 25 minutes.
EWS was recorded in just 30% of the charts. Patient outcomes included a 60%
recovery rate, 20% mortality, and 20% with undocumented outcomes.
Conclusion: While ICU staff at UPTH demonstrated high awareness of abnormal vital signs, significant gaps were observed in escalation practices and EWS utilisation. These findings highlight systemic and cultural barriers to effective critical care response and underscore the need for institutional reforms, including mandatory EWS integration, staff empowerment, and continuous audit-feedback mechanisms to improve patient safety and outcomes.