- UKOH, Oluebere Blessing & OHAGIM, Salem Odichukwumma
- DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.24048565
- SSR Journal of Economics, Business and Management (SSRJEBM)
This study
investigates the problems and opportunities in Corporate Social Responsibility
(CSR) reporting, concentrating on fragmented reporting standards, green-washing
concerns, and resource restrictions facing firms, particularly Small and
Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs). This research employs an exploratory
methodology using secondary data from academic journals, industry reports, and
media sources to examine how standardisation challenges and operational
bottlenecks erode stakeholder trust and diminish reporting efficacy. The
results indicate that the lack of standardised frameworks (GRI, SASB, and TCFD)
leads to issues in comparability, while substantial implementation costs and
insufficient third-party certification methods exacerbate the risks of green-washing,
as illustrated by incidents like Volkswagen’s “Dieselgate” affair.
Utilising Stakeholder Theory (Freeman, 1984) and Legitimacy Theory (Dowling
& Pfeffer, 1975), the study illustrates that CSR reporting has transitioned
from voluntary generosity to a strategic necessity, but structural obstacles
remain. Opportunities arise from technical advances such as artificial
intelligence and blockchain, standardised worldwide practices, and improved
stakeholder participation. The study concluded that CSR reporting is no longer
optional but crucial for creating trust, guaranteeing resilience, and securing
competitive advantage. Recommendations include campaigning for consolidated
reporting frameworks, utilising digital tools for cost-effective data management,
and fostering multi-stakeholder engagement to turn CSR reporting from
compliance burden into strategic value creation catalyst.
Keywords: CSR reporting, Stakeholder theory, Green-washing, Sustainability, ESG frameworks, corporate accountability.

