- Aniako Chibuzo Aniako1, Victor Kelechi Nwodo1, Michael Promise Ogolodom2, Hyacienth Uche Chiegwu1, Emeka E. Ezugwu1, Sharonrose Ogochukwu Nwadike1
- DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18223132
- SSR Journal of Medical Sciences (SSRJMS)
Background: Effective
shielding is bottom line of radiation protection in diagnostic radiology. Lead
and concrete traditionally used for radiation shielding, have environmental,
health and cost limitations. Clays, being mast abundant and variable in
composition may serve as viable alternatives if their attenuation properties
are well characterized.
Aim: This study
aimed to determine the attenuation coefficients of brown and red clay at
varying thicknesses under X-ray interaction (75 keV) and a constant density
(2.353 g/cm3 and 2.632 g/cm3 for brown and red clay respectively) at a constant
distance of 2m, to compare their relative efficiency and to assess their
suitability for radiation shielding compared with standard materials.
Materials
and methods: An experimental design
was used. Clay slabs of thicknesses 5–24 cm (brown) and 5–28 cm (red) were
prepared at densities of 2.35 g/cm³ and 2.63 g/cm³, respectively. A 75 keV
X-ray source was directed through the slabs at a distance of 2m, and
transmitted intensities were measured. Attenuation parameters (µ, µ/ρ, HVL,
MHVL) were calculated. Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics and
independent sample t-tests.
Results: Brown clay
recorded µ values of 0.041–0.067 cm⁻¹ (mean 0.0535 ± 0.0085), HVL 10.3–16.8 cm
(mean 13.25 ± 2.14), and MHVL 31.17 ± 5.04 g/cm². Red clay recorded µ values of
0.017–0.044 cm⁻¹ (mean 0.0353 ± 0.0100), HVL 15.8–40.7 cm (mean 21.82 ± 9.51),
and MHVL 57.43 ± 25.02 g/cm². Differences in µ (p = 0.007) and MHVL (p = 0.030)
were significant.
Conclusion: Compared with literature, brown clay aligned with concrete, while red clay was less effective. Brown clay outperforms red clay due to its higher iron-rich content and may serve as an eco-friendly alternative to concrete for structural shielding. Narrow-beam validated studies, compositional analyses, and clay-composite development are recommended. Iron-rich clays should be considered for sustainable secondary shielding in diagnostic radiology.

