Scribal Corrections in Early Greek New Testament Papyri: Trends and Exegetical Implications

Critical insights into the textual transmission process, capturing scribal corrections, and revisions across centuries, have been provided by Early Greek New Testament papyri. However, in light of evolving philological and computational approaches, these corrections remain under-analyzed. Traditional analysis of corrections relies on limited manuscript sample and manual comparison, which may under represent correction trends and their interpretive importance. This paper seeks to first, analyze scribal corrections in selected early papyri, for instance P^66, P^75, Bodmer Papyri, second, categorize correction types and patterns, and third, assess their theological and exegetical implications. The study quantifies corrections such as harmonizing, orthographic, and doctrinal variants, by employing high-resolution digital images and collation of data. The paper compares these across manuscripts and theological themes, referencing recent computational datasets and paleographic studies. Scribes frequently engaged in orthographic standardization, harmonization, and marginal adjustments, as indicated by preliminary results. Some corrections likely aim at textual clarity, while others reflect doctrinal alignment. Scribal corrections are deliberate editorial acts with exegetical weight, and are not merely errors. This underscores the development and continuity of interpretive traditions. The study recommends that future scholarship should integrate computational tools to map correction pattern at scale and explore theological motivation behind textual stabilization.