- Odey Peter Wonah, Ohagwam Chidinma Maureen and Onoja Sunday Onoja
- DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21837972
- SSR Journal of Engineering and Technology (SSRJET)
Contemporary aviation depends on tightly coupled
information-technology, operational-technology and cyber-physical assets
spanning aircraft, airports, air-traffic services, maintenance, ground
operations and cloud platforms. Conventional perimeter security provides
insufficient protection once credentials, suppliers, mobile devices or trusted
network segments are compromised. This study proposes a Safety-Aware Adaptive
Zero Trust Architecture (SA-AZTA) that continuously evaluates human, device,
service and workload requests using identity confidence, device integrity,
behavioural conformity, mission context, threat intelligence, privilege risk,
asset criticality and prospective safety impact. A safety gate constrains
automated response so that suspicious activity can be restricted, isolated or
escalated without indiscriminately interrupting safety-critical services. The
architecture was evaluated in a reproducible synthetic major-airport case
study. A detailed main run comprised 50,000 access events, while 30 Monte Carlo
runs of 20,000 events each compared perimeter security, role-based access
control, static attribute-based access control, non-adaptive Zero Trust and
SA-AZTA. Across the Monte Carlo runs, SA-AZTA achieved mean accuracy of 96.99%,
precision of 92.78%, recall of 92.10%, F1-score of 92.43%, ROC-AUC of 99.25%
and a false-positive rate of 1.79%. Mean attack containment was 93.09%, service
availability was 99.40% and policy-decision latency was 7.58 ms. The
improvement over every baseline was statistically significant in paired
Wilcoxon tests (p < 1.9 × 10^-9), although the proposed model introduced
approximately 2.17 ms additional latency relative to non-adaptive Zero Trust.
Ablation analysis showed that behavioural analytics contributed most to detection
performance, whereas microsegmentation contributed most to limiting lateral
movement. The results provide evidence that context-rich, safety-constrained
Zero Trust can improve cyber resilience in aviation CPS; however, findings
remain simulation-based and require digital-twin, hardware-in-the-loop and
regulated operational validation.
Keywords: zero trust architecture; aviation
cybersecurity; cyber-physical systems; adaptive access control; safety-security
co-engineering; microsegmentation; trust modelling; synthetic simulation.
