- Gilbert I.O Aimufua, Abdulazeez Ogunlade Babatunde
- DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21736576
- SSR Journal of Artificial Intelligence (SSRJAI)
Large Language Models (LLMs) now sit at
the centre of many digital services, supporting the generation, summarisation,
interpretation, and use of natural-language and multimodal information. As
these models are connected to retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), external
tools, cloud platforms, enterprise knowledge bases, and autonomous agents, the
security boundary extends well beyond the model itself. This article critically
reviews adversarial vulnerabilities across the wider LLM ecosystem using
peer-reviewed studies, influential preprints, and authoritative standards
available up to July 2026. It examines prompt injection, jailbreaks, data and
model poisoning, backdoors, model extraction, membership inference,
training-data extraction, RAG manipulation, supply-chain compromise, multimodal
attacks, and the misuse of agentic tools. Current safeguards, including
reinforcement learning from human feedback, adversarial training, prompt and
output filtering, retrieval validation, differential privacy, red teaming, and
explainability, reduce some risks but remain inadequate against adaptive and
multi-stage attacks. In response, the article introduces the Adaptive
Multi-Layered Adversarial Defense Framework (AMADF), a ten-layer enterprise
architecture covering identity and access management, prompt sanitisation, retrieval
provenance, semantic threat detection, secure inference, explainability-based
risk scoring, output validation, human review, continuous monitoring, and
governance. AMADF draws on Defense-in-Depth, Zero Trust Architecture, the NIST
AI Risk Management Framework, Explainable AI, and socio-technical security
principles. It offers organisations a practical structure for designing,
assessing, and governing secure LLM deployments, although its effectiveness
still requires empirical testing in operational environments.
Keywords: Large Language Models, adversarial machine learning, prompt injection, jailbreak attacks, retrieval-augmented generation, AI agents, Zero Trust, Explainable AI, trustworthy artificial intelligence, cybersecurity.
