- Ajakaye, Christopher Friday; Saba, Love Olufunke; Dahunsi, Kayode Femi &Adeyemo Nelson Gbenga
- DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.23832664
- SSR Journal of Multidisciplinary (SSRJM)
This paper x-rays conversational
implicature in President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s Democracy Day address of June 12,
2026, using Jacob Mey’s (2001) Pragmatic Acts Theory (PAT) as its linguistic
framework, read alongside Grice’s (1975) theory of conversational implicature
and the Cooperative Principle. Where classical Gricean analysis locates
implicature in a speaker’s calculated flouting of the maxims of quantity,
quality, relation, and manner, Mey’s PAT relocates the source of pragmatic
meaning from the utterance itself to the situated context, or “affordances,”
within which the utterance occurs. This paper argues that the two frameworks
are complementary rather than competing. Grice identifies where implicated
meaning arises in the text, while Mey’s pragmeme, pract, and allopract explain
why a Nigerian audience, equipped with shared situational and cultural
knowledge, is able to recover that meaning. Close interpretation of the June
12, 2026 address identifies five recurring pragmemes in the speech, reassuring,
reframing, warning/threatening, appealing for patience, and
commending/legitimising. The paper concludes that Tinubu’s address relies
heavily on what is left unsaid, using implicature to manage politically
sensitive admissions without appearing evasive.
Keywords: conversational
implicature, Pragmatic Acts Theory, Cooperative Principle, Tinubu, Democracy
Day.

